Skip to content

The Absent and Misrepresented Women of My Adolescence


As a child, I developed an interest in the Bible only after I realized there were stories my Sabbath School teachers left out. For example, I remember being shocked when I discovered that Joseph had a sister, Dinah. Why would everyone mention every single brother and question me to see if I could remember their different roles in his story, but no one mentioned his sister?

The women who were mentioned were either wicked women, like Delilah and Jezebel, or they were presented has having minor roles compared to their fellow male characters, like Sarah and the more important Abraham or Miriam and the more important Moses.

I was uninterested in the biblical text until I discovered the prevalence of women within my sacred scripture. I was given the opportunity to read and hear their stories without someone guiding me to consider the male as the primary and most important character. I could now read Genesis for the purpose of learning about Rebecca and Leah or read 1 and 2 Samuel to learn about Michal and Tamar. It was in this way that I found characters like me that I could identify with. These female characters were my entry point to the biblical world and what sparked my interest in personal study.

This methodology of reading the biblical text and focusing on the female characters has served me well and is what I am currently writing a thesis on. However, not everyone is okay with my interest in female characters. One Sabbath, a colleague and I presented on the women in Judges and discussed how important mutually beneficial relationships between men and women are to God’s community. We showed how as the Israelite community broke away from God, the relationships between men and women became more and more destructive. Despite our insistence that this issue was about the mutually beneficial relationships between women and men, an attendee instructed us to stop being angry with men.

To this individual, our focus on biblical women was an act of aggression towards men; and he is not the only one who thinks this way.

Why is it that the stories of wicked women and important men are told more often than the stories about immoral men and important women? Why is it that no one cares if a man speaks, but we have to go through decades of church wide discussions to permit women to speak? And why is it that controversial male leaders do not have their names removed from directories while women leaders are ignored? What is wrong with sharing stories of strong, good biblical women? What is wrong with female representation in church leadership?

There is a connection between our communal fear of strong, good biblical women and our communal debate over women’s role in the home and church. Ignoring, deemphasizing, and delegitimizing biblical women is connected to our actions of ignoring, deemphasizing and delegitimizing Adventist women and their God given gifts of strength and leadership.

We need to share the stories of women like Achsah and Deborah, emphasize characters like Hannah and Huldah, and legitimize the many biblical women we have misinterpreted as seducers and evil tricksters, like Tamar in Genesis. We need to do this on behalf of the girls in Sabbath School who are not hearing stories of good role models that look like them. We need to do this on behalf of the women who are underrepresented in congregations. We need to do this for the benefit of our church as a whole.

Mindy Bielas is currently a M.A. student at Claremont School of Theology, focusing on Hebrew Bible and Women and Gender Studies. She graduated from La Sierra University with a BA in Religious Studies and Pre-Seminary as well as a Masters of Theological Studies. Prior to her degree at CST, she pastored at Vallejo Drive SDA Church. When she is not studying she enjoys painting. To see some of her art work visit

The article image above was painted by the author.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Spectrum Newsletter: The latest Adventist news at your fingertips.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.