
I was leery about watching Lars and the Real Girl. From the little bit I knew about the film, it appeared strange, which could be good, and awkward, which, for my particular personality, is bad. It is a film about a man who thinks a sex doll is his girlfriend (not private lover, but public girlfriend). Enter everyone else stage right. How much more awkward could it get?
However, it is not really a film about a man who thinks a sex doll is his girlfriend; it is really a film about how a community loves and supports this man at a time when he needs it most. I was thoroughly surprised and satisfied at the healthy journey this film took me on, and found that my worries regarding awkwardness were quite needless.
Jumping right to the point, the writer conveys in a feature on the DVD that the film is about what could happen if a community would let a “mentally ill” person be himself. In other words, it’s about what could happen if the “illness” diagnosis is dropped and the person is treated with love and respect like a human. This film presents that “what if” beautifully.
In this story Lars is the person with delusions. At first, the viewer just learns that Lars is reclusive and anti-social. Then, nearly out of the blue, Lars introduces his not-quite-human romantic interest, Bianca, and he is oblivious to the not-quite-human part of the equation. Much further into the film, some light is shed on some of the issues with which Lars is dealing, although (and I love this part) his delusions are never defined. Lars then begins a growth process that is not brought about because of Bianca, but because of everyone else’s reaction to Bianca.
Over the course of the film, for me there are three main gifts that Lars receives: acceptance from his brother Gus, grace from his doctor, and love from the townsfolk. Those may sound similar, and they are related, but each one had its own special flavor.
Acceptance from Gus was not quick in coming. Gus’s initial reactions, while comical at certain moments, did not (thankfully) go the direction of basic comedy writing in America: satirical and insulting. Gus was frustrated and worried, but he was also real and believable. He chose to help his brother, he acted on his choice, and slowly but surely his heart came around. By the end of the film, his caring interactions with his brother are much more natural and the guidance he offers Lars, while not necessarily inspired, is at least genuine and pure.
The family physician, Dr. Dagmar, is an angel. She does not try to force Lars to change. Instead she tries to understand him, and in doing so, grants him the grace to open up. Grace is what starts him down the path toward healing. Dagmar’s brave decision to offer Lars grace is what also opens the door for the entire community to have a chance to show love to Lars. The movie is worth watching just to view this grace being offered.
On the community level, coworkers, church members, and others go out on a limb and support Lars where he is. They show a picture of love in action that we often only talk about. Not only do they play along that Bianca is real, they make her contribution to society real. One cannot help but smile when Bianca, in all practicality, lands multiple part-time jobs.
There are other key elements to this film too, such as Gus’s wife Karin being the communicator who ties everything together and coworker Margo being the seed for a promising conventional relationship, but the gifts I’ve listed are what struck me most.
This film is definitely worth seeing. The love, grace, and sense of community are a feast for the heart. The acting is all that could be asked for and the writing is a step above most scripts. In more than one place the true beauty of the people brought tears to my eyes. It still does.
Bob Thayne writes from Portland, OR where he is an engineer.
Just a note to everyone, I'm sorry that this month's film club discussion is so tardy. It isn't Bob's fault--he's the one who stepped in to help when my original reviewer fell through. Thanks Bob!
I watched this film also with some trepidation. Actually, if I hadn't seen so many good reviews of it, I'm not sure a film that featured a silicon sex doll would have ever enticed me to the theater. When my weekly CT email called this film one of the best portrayals of a Christian community ever, I decided to check it out. It's simply a beautiful film that's well written and well acted. The doctor is brilliant, and I love that she explains to the family that "Bianca is here" whether they like it or not. Mental illness doesn't just go away because we wish it so.
The way the community decides to embrace Lars and his "girlfriend" models grace in such a powerful way that it often brings both tears and laughter.
If you watch movies at all this is a must see. I, too, was skeptical given the premise of a sex object being a girl friend, but Bob is right. That's not what the film is about.
While the movie is cute and clever, it is also deep and moving. One scene when the girl friend falls ill, the older women of the church come just to sit with Lars. When he asks why, they say, "That's what people do when there is tragedy."
Would that we all belonged to such a caring an compassionate community.
What I found insightful was that there was no groups advocating for the right to marry plastic women in the movie. No groups marching the streets saying God made my son to love plastic women or if my son wants to have a monogomous relationship with plastic woman, who are you to deny my son his civil rights?
What made the unified and sympathetic response possible was that there was complete agreement in the movie by the community that the devient/deluded behaviour was unfortunate and non desireable.
They took the same attitude one takes with a 6 year old that passionately believes in Santa Claus. They supported in a way that resulted in him inventing the conditions that led him ever closer to seperation from that lifestyle.
I am forced to wonder if the reviews would have been as good if in the end instead of him killing her, he had been encouraged along lines where he decided to marry her.
Michael
It is a wonderful movie. I don't think anyone can help but be skeptical when hearing about a movie that is built on the premise of a man and his life size doll.
this is a movie I would like to see churches offer to their youth for a night at the movies. They will want to talk about it after it is over and the message of community is inspiring.
Adventist Media and Conversation Blog
I enjoyed this film immensely. As I recall, it's set in Iowa or Minnesota, and having lived in Nebraska (working at Union College) for four years, I can say (as a born East Coast person and now a Californian) that part of the message of this film is how rooted and grounded in reality and love the good people of the Midwest are. I often miss that goodness.
I really enjoyed this film.
1. I liked the moment when Gus, Lars' older brother, talks to him about what mature masculinity means. Those principles spoke to me.
2. I thought that Bianca functioned - in some ways - like God does for us in religious community. There, present. . .but in someways not like the rest of us. Also, like Lars did - using Bianca as a stand in for his own process of individuation - we often go through stages in our understanding of the divine, shedding the childish Santa Claus God and finding a deeper divine in our relationships and responsibilities to all of God's creation.
It's good to see how many of you had a positive experience with this film. Michael--Lars doesn't "kill" Bianca, although with a stretch I can see how you might say that. As Alex points out, Bianca is a "stand in for [Lars'] own process of individuation." The grace and acceptance that the community shows him allows him to grow in his understanding of relationships and even the divine (the church plays a big role in this film), which is what allows him to let go of Bianca, mature, and move on to a relationship with a "real girl."
Daneen
Sure I said he killed her since he was the one inventing, on the fly, her storyline.
Lars knew the community for many years and they knew of no history of his mental illness. Neither did his brother. The first clue they got was when he showed up for dinner with Bianca.
I dont see any individuation process at all. Prior to his Bianca dillusion he was a normal guy to his family and his community. He had a normal job and was fully functional. Did he have no individuation before his delusion?
When he was "cured" his realization wasnt the true one where he said he realized Bianca was a plastic girl, his realization was only subconcious where he found he didnt need her anymore and thus made her become sick and die.
How then is this end state of the movie his achievement of individuation?
Michael
Lars held a normal job (one that required extremely little human interaction), but the filmmakers clearly show that he isn't fully functional. He is chronically and pathologically shy and unable to engage in full relationships with equals. Remember how hard his sister-in-law is trying to get him to engage and how it isn't working? He hides when she knocks on the door. And his relationships at work are non-functional. Even at church he can't engage (the whole comment about the fake flowers to the church lady foreshadows his relationship with Bianca).
Bianca is a symptom of his immaturity and inability to deal with "real" people (his brother thinks it's because he was left alone with his father who had lost the ability to give love). To paraphrase the psychologist, Bianca was there for a reason, and when she was no longer needed, she left. The incredible ability of the community to embrace him and Bianca so they really entered into his struggles with him is what gave him the space to eventually mature and heal.
[Preliminary note to anyone who has not seen the film: If you don't want stuff given away, don't read what follows until after you've rented the DVD]
I'd like to second and expand a little on Daneen's mention of the sister-in-law, Karin. She is much more than the "communicator who ties everything together" as Bob Thayne calls her. (I really like your review, Bob; I'm just expanding here, not criticizing.) Karin goes aggressively out on a limb to bring Lars into normal human relations, to the point of tackling him in middle of their snowy driveway trying to get him to come and eat with her and his brother. She is utterly convinced about his need, rejecting Gus's suggestion that maybe Lars just wants to be how he is. "That's not how people are!" she insists.
And it is not just her indefatigable and aggressive grace that finally moves Lars to begin his growth and individuation (definitely the right word); it is also the fact that she is pregnant. We learn later that this fact terrifies Lars because his own birth was, in his understanding, the cause of his mother's death and his father's deadly despair. His panic in the doctor's office over these fears reminds us of his concern for the baby in the very first scene of the film where he lends his sweater to keep mother-to-be Karin warm, even as he resists her urging to come to breakfast. The coming birth, it seems, is perhaps the best explanation for why Bianca showed up WHEN she did. Karin's selfless love, which allows her to be a bit ridiculous in her reaching out to her brother-in-law, is the best explanation I can see in the story for why Bianca showed up at all.
In both spirit and body, then, Karin is a prime mover of the plot of this wonderful fantasy.
It IS a fantasy, unfortunately, as I believe there is no community so pure in its love and so free of self-consciousness and self-concern as to rise so effectively to a situation like Lars presents. Nevertheless, the fantasy holds up for us the reality of a Grace to which we may aspire and makes its characters so believable as to convince us that our aspirations might be realistic.
I also LOVED the line "that's what people do when there's a tragedy. They come over and sit." Really, we want to DO so much that we often forget that. And I think there are lots of real-life examples in my own community of people doing that in tragedy. Nothing to be done but come and sit.
Another favorite moment--Dr. Dagmar also opens herself up to show her own woundedness by admitting she wished that she could have had a baby. That's often what allows us to be part of the healing process--our own admission of our own weakness.
The entire community is shown to have their own problems--and admitting those is part of them being present in Lars' pain.
I agree, however, no community could keep this up for too long. But I have also seen groups of people really come together for wounded persons. They might not know how the healing will occur--but just as often they don't know what the real problem is (as we can only guess at Lars' real pathology). They do what they can for as long as they can.
Loved it. Thanks for the recommendation.
"The coming birth, it seems, is perhaps the best explanation for why Bianca showed up WHEN she did. Karin's selfless love, which allows her to be a bit ridiculous in her reaching out to her brother-in-law, is the best explanation I can see in the story for why Bianca showed up at all."
This is the best explaination of this part. Why Bianca showed up when she did.
I just cant yet see how in an example of a community that is so good and wonderful and does exactally the right things, why wait to do them until Lars goes so far as taking a plastic girl on public dates?
Michael
Greg has a great point about why Bianca likely showed up when she did, and I'd say that her arrival also signaled to Lars' family and the community just how much he needed their help.
Karin was reaching out to Lars before the arrival of Bianca--as Greg points out, in almost a ridiculous manner of unconditional love. However, it's often quite easy for us to just get used to someone's quirks and mannerisms so that we might just go on with our lives not realizing that they really aren't okay. I know I've been guilty of that--it's not intentional, but we all get caught up in our own lives so easily that we miss the subtle signs others give us that they need help. A life-size plastic doll is not a subtle sign--she was a gigantic, flashing billboard saying "I need help" to the whole town. What was so beautiful and uplifting about this story was that they listened.
We saw this on a recommendation from friends, and we weren't quite sure what to expect. We loved the movie for all the reasons stated in previous reviews and now recommend it as a movie that beautifully portrays what true community is all about.
I haven't seen it yet, but this conversation is making sure that I do. I am struck just by reading here that this doll's reality comes from the life breathed into her by the compassion and creativity of the community. We were only mud dolls before our Primal Lover did that for us. No wonder Lucifer thought He was nuts.
WOW!
I thought this movie was so creepy, then about an hour into the film I saw a sweet movie emerge. A movie that showed to what lengths a community could love one of it's own. A movie that showed the best side of the human experience. This town loved Lars so much that it accepted his Doll as a real person.
What the world would look like if we all loved each other that much.
This is a strange movie that will hit you square in the eyes with a message of kindness and love.
I hope everyone give this film a chance to enhance their life.
-DH
My wife summed it up best "I've never been so happy to see a nut job get better."
Hello from Croatia...saw the film yesterday with my wife...that is what we need in our churches.
Add your comment