My favorite analysis thus far:

"I propose since this man doesn't believe that Jesus saves, who cares what he says."

"To suggest that God/Jesus are none violent, is to suggest what the Bible contradicts."

"Spot On Douglas!!"

Even if I don't agree with him about the historicity of Jesus, perhaps his definitions of literalism and fundamentalism bear more than dismissal in the Adventist context.

Or do these definitions hit too close to home?

Posted by: Alexander Carpenter | 20 July 2008 at 9:44

Reply

Because conversation is our mission, we publish all comments immediately. We simply request that you focus on the posted topic, and not attack anyone or use profanity. Please sign your post. Consistently used pseudonyms are acceptable, but "anonymous" is not. This site is a place for thoughtful conversation and a healthy exchange of ideas and perspective; rants and tirades don't further this mission and are not appropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments which do not follow these guidelines. Thank You!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login