
Whenever I am passing through Chicago and circumstances permit I try to attend a service at Willow Creek Community Church in South Barrington, IL. Since I live a considerable distance away that isn’t too often. But last weekend I was there.
Willow Creek sometimes evokes strong reaction – both pro and con – within Adventism. But that debate is largely beside the point I wish to explore here. I have never left one of their services without feeling uplifted, and frequently challenged. And that was again the case this time.
The speaker was a guest – Dave Workman – senior pastor of the Vineyard Community Church in Cincinnati, Ohio. His topic was Servanthood, and was intended to complement a Ministry Fair Willow was conducting for its members. His starting text was, as you might guess, Mark 9:35: “If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all.” And he moved into an exposition of what it means to have an outward-focused life and what radical servanthood might mean for a Christian.
Workman proposed the revolutionary idea that a Born-Again Christian needs to still be Born Again one more time. The first new birth makes you a believer. The second transforms you from a receiver to a giver. And it is only after this second born-again experience that a Christian is fully formed.
Vineyard is intensely oriented toward serving with many and diverse activities directed toward the community. And certainly, they are aware of and sensitive toward the evangelistic possibilities. But what was especially interesting to me was their even stronger intent to isolate those possibilities from any bottom-line reasons for serving. That is, they reach out to their community and leave any resulting response to just happen with no nudging by the church. This goes considerably beyond, I think, what is sometimes called the ‘un-baited hook’. Here there is no hook at all. Just an open door.
The contrast between this philosophy and historic, or even contemporary, Adventist outreach is stark. Now it is not my intent here to make any backhanded jabs at the institutional church. And I would hope respondents would also exercise restraint. Rather I would like to reflect on what it is we Christians should be all about doing here below. Certainly evangelism is front and center in scripture, as are good works. But it is intriguing to consider whether Vineyard’s approach has any value as a model for Adventism. They totally embrace service, with doctrinal teaching coming much later, and any request is initiated by the recipient of their service. Adventism has operated much differently with a major emphasis on communicating propositional truths and a focus toward eschatology. But perhaps we sometimes confuse ends and means. It seems almost self-evident to me that everything Adventists have ever done to win people must be considered as means, not ends. And therefore, as means, the methods must be viewed pragmatically. It is the ends – salvation for lost people and lives transformed – that must be held inviolate.
Now Adventism’s past evangelistic methodology would likely be an inhibiter to major tactical change. But that caveat, while pragmatically important, is moot when asking the more fundamental question of how faithful Christians should interact with their surrounding culture. Are Workman and his philosophical brethren too radical? If so, why? If not, why not?
Rich Hannon is a software engineer who lives in Salt Lake City. His reading interests focus on philosophy and medieval history.
Comments
Rich,
Thanks for the post. This brought to mind the story of Jesus healing the ten men who suffered from leprosy, with only one coming back to give thanks.
Seems that Jesus simply healed them all with no strings attached, nor any hook, baited or otherwise. The one who came back, came of his own volition. And, there is no record that the others were suddenly "unhealed" because they didn't.
In this case, Jesus just did good, and left the results between the recipients and God.
Thanks again...
Frank
As evidence that there is more to Adventism than just evangelism, I would like to point to ADRA, plus the many Community Service and Dorcas Societies at local churches. The Adventist health message is also meant to help people live more healthfully. We do have some wonderful precedents for service to the community. They need to be born again and to flourish in our congregations.
Rich,
Great post. This is something I've been thinking about a lot recently, partially because, as Frank pointed out, this seems to be how Jesus worked.
Unfortunately, my experience growing up as a PK is different. It seems that many of our other outreach activities, such as stop smoking plans and such, were or are thinly veiled attempts to get people in the door and vulnerable to more conventional evangelism.
Our motivation seems very different from what Workman was talking about and from what I see in the outreach of the Mennonites and Salvation Army, for example. I think that those we are helping and observers outside the church can also feel the difference, and it diminishes our efforts and keeps away some of those whom we want to help.
As Bonnie said, our activities in ADRA and community service are good. I just wish we poured more of our energy into these.
Thanks,
Eric
A few weeks back, I raised a similar question in our sabbath school. What if our hindthoughts behind helping hinder us many a times from just helping? "What's the use? If someone doesn't hear from God, the help is in itself useless," was the general reply and consent. I kept my thoughts to myself. Tell that to your hungry brother.
Post new comment