Spectrum Blog

Time to End the End of Time

Last night, a throwaway line in HBO's Game of Thrones about "the end of the world" by some men exploring the edge of their territory made me think of the phrase's space and time definitions. Thanks to circumnavigation we no longer believe it applies geographically. Is it time to remove its temporal meaning too?

Today is the one-year anniversary of the end of the world, according to Harold Camping. In a fantastic report for Religion Dispatches, titled "A Year After the Non-Apocalypse," Tom Bartlett tracks down some of his followers and seeks to understand the past and sometimes even present nature of their faith. He gets beyond the usual gawking media approach and actually listens to their stories, their evangelistic appeals, and their explanations for what happened. As others have done, he hears them in light of apocalyptic movements like the Millerites, and helpfully, he also contextualizes these experiences through Leon Festinger's 1956 classic, When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of A Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World. Festinger writes:

Although there is a limit beyond which belief will not withstand disconfirmation, it is clear that the introduction of contrary evidence can serve to increase the conviction and enthusiasm of a believer.

This understanding of believer disappointment and belief rationalization provide opportunities for serious self-awareness at an individual and community level. Do we have a flat earth eschatology?

Why care about the end of the world? It seems to get folks into trouble. But can it also be a good?

Out of error comes new truth. The time of trial also provides a catalyzing context for the recreation of faith for a new temporal context. The worldly success of Adventism is not the only example, as apocalyptic movements have renewed many denominations and even birthed entirely new belief systems. Bartlett shares his experience trying to understanding the Camping followers, some of whom were very serious thinkers.

When I asked how they could be so sure, the answers were fuzzy. It wasn’t any one particular verse or chapter but rather the evidence as a whole. Some believers compared it to a puzzle. At first the pieces are spread out on a table, just shards of color, fragments of meaning. Then you assemble, piece by piece, finding a corner here, a connection there, until you begin to make out a portion of the picture, a glimpse of the scene.

Confusion out the geographical end of the world also led to new discoveries. Some good and some terrible. Over time our sense of the shape of the world changed and almost everyone realized that a spherical understanding of the earth modeled reality better.

These days Adventism is torn apart by fights not only about the end of the world but also its beginning. As we argue about Genesis, we simultaneously give out millions of book providing an outline of the apocalypse. These signs of the times appear to define our human identity to the core. But then, not that long ago, so did the four corners of the world.

Rather than worrying that Adventism might lose something on its edges, perhaps we can focus on something greater. What's worth saving? What's salvational? After all, in that great book of apocalypse, which really connotes the revelation of deeper truths, Jesus defines himself as the alpha and the omega, the final Word on the beginning and the end. It's not an event that began or ends it all. It is a mediating Presence. Focusing on that Truth just might save us from having a flat earth eschatology in a spacetime world.

(Thanks to Keith Lockhart and Robert Jacobson.) BTW: We have not turned off commenting forever. We're just waiting for DISQUS.

NPUC Plans Action on Women in Church Leadership

According to this week's headlines in GleanerNow!:

In response to a North Pacific Union Conference (NPUC) Executive Committee vote on May 16, NPUC administration will appoint an ad hoc committee to help resolve issues of women in Adventist ministry. This ad hoc committee will be tasked with creating specific recommendations on how to fully integrate committed and called Adventist women into all levels of church leadership within the NPUC territory. The recommendations will be presented to the NPUC Executive Committee at the next scheduled meeting on Nov. 14, 2012.

Columbia Union Calls Constituency Meeting to Vote on Ordination

The Columbia Union Conference sent out the following press release:

At its May 17 meeting, the Columbia Union Conference Executive Committee received a report from an ad hoc committee assigned to study how to affirm women in ministry.

After discussing the report (included below), the committee voted:

  1. To recognize its responsibility to act morally and ethically by expressing unyielding commitment to ordain qualified persons to the gospel ministry without regard to gender, and
  2. To call a special constituency meeting for the purpose of authorizing ordination to the gospel ministry without regard to gender, and
  3. To set the meeting date for July 29, 2012, at 10 a.m., at a location to be determined in Maryland.

The committee approved the motion by a vote of 34-6, with one abstention.

“I believe this action represents our committee's desire to move the mission forward, and we are calling this special session to facilitate a wider conversation,” said Dave Weigley, union president, explaining the need for input from the larger constituency.

To help members understand the committee!s perspective, leaders will publish a special July issue of the union paper, the Visitor. It will provide an in-depth review of biblical, historical and Spirit of Prophecy guidelines concerning the role of women in ministry.

UPDATE: The Columbia Union Ad Hoc Committee also released the following report:

Report of the Columbia Union Ad Hoc Committee Affirming Women in Ministry Women in Seventh-day Adventist ministry are being affirmed through appreciation, recognition and representation at many levels in the church. This needs to be continued and increased. The most significant confirmation, however, requires the action of the Columbia Union Conference Executive Committee. The affirmation of women in ministry in the Adventist church has both a moral and ethical imperative based on Scripture, church history and our diversity in unity.
SCRIPTURE: As a global church that values the authority of Scripture, we acknowledge that:
A. Scripture is clear that the end-time church is blessed with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on all believers (Joel 2:28-29 and Acts 2:17-18), with the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9) and through the empowerment of the Holy Spirit, both women and men preach God!s message (Fundamental Beliefs 14 and 17).
B. We are commanded to practice justice in our actions and relationships (Micah 6:8). C. Everything contained in the Bible relates to the concepts represented in three words: Creation, Fall, and Redemption. This continuum provides the natural outline to the biblical story. In Eden, God created male and female as equals, both spiritually and relationally, and both are necessary to fully reflect the image of God (2 Corinthians 5:17- 20).
D. Multiple times throughout Scripture God chose women to lead His people (Deborah, Esther, Hulda, Anna, four daughters of Philip, Phoebe, Junia etc.).
 
HISTORY: As a global church that values God!s leading in its history we acknowledge the following significant hallmarks:
A. The Seventh-day Adventist Church was co-founded by a woman, Ellen G. White, who remains an authoritative and guiding voice.
B. The General Conference Session on December 5, 1881, voted: “RESOLVED, That females possessing the necessary qualifications to fill that position, may, with perfect propriety, be set apart by ordination to the work of the Christian ministry.” Reported in Review and Herald, Dec. 20, 1881. It appears there was no record of any action taken.
C. Ellen White wrote in the July 9, 1895, Review & Herald, of a ministry that women, who gave themselves to it, should be set apart to this work by prayer and laying on of hands.
D. Willie White ordained deaconesses on January 6, 1900, in Australia. In 1975 an action was taken to ordain deaconesses at GC Session. In 1985 the action was reaffirmed and in 2010 it was recorded in the Church Manual. Ordination of women elders was approved in 1975 and reaffirmed at Annual Council in 1984.
E. The General Conference voted to authorize women to serve as pastors (1990). F. Sixteen female pastors have already been ordained in China. These women are playing
a significant role in the rapid church growth in their country and the Northern Asia Pacific Division of Seventh-day Adventists recognizes their ordinations.
 
DIVERSITY IN UNITY: As a global church that values diversity in unity:
A. We affirm that diversity in unity is part of the divine order for creation, redemption, restoration and for the church (Ephesians 4, John 17, 1 Corinthians 12:12).
B. We affirm God's leading in utilizing the talents of women for the mission of the church. ”When a great and decisive work is to be done, God chooses men and women to do this work, and it will feel the loss if the talents of both are not combined” (Evangelism, p. 469).
C. We understand that “there must be room to recognize the need for a legitimacy of local adaptation of policies and procedures that facilitate mission while not diminishing the worldwide identity, harmony and unity of the Church” (GC Spring Council 2012 116-12G Report).
D. We celebrate our diversity of culture, gender and ethnicity.
E. We recognize that “The distribution of authority and responsibility in the church, along with the recognition that "authority rests in membership,! presents significant challenges in finding a balance between centralized authority (actions of the global church) and the more localized authority (actions of the constituency) in churches, conferences and unions.
 
“At the same time, the church has worked to preserve unity, the effect of church growth has enlarged the understanding of diversity and its rightful place in a worldwide community. To expect that every entity in the world church will look and function exactly like every other entity of its type may in itself become an impediment to mission. The development of structural designs in the history of the church indicates that unity must be built on a stronger foundation than uniformity” (GC Spring Council 2012 116-12G Report).
 
F. We acknowledge that “different elements of organizational authority are distributed among the various levels of denominational organization ... decisions regarding the ordination of ministers are entrusted to the union conference/mission ...” (NAD Working Policy B 05, 6).
G. We recognize that ordination is for the world church (NAD Working Policy L 40 and L 45 05). We further recognize that ordained ministers may not function outside the territory of the organization issuing their credential, unless invited to do so.
 
Note: All scriptural references are from the New King James Version (NKJV).

UPDATE: Our Move to DISQUS Will Take a Little Longer

UPDATE: We encountered a few errors with our import, and the process is taking a little longer than anticipated. We will have the comments back up and running mid-week.

Spectrum's conversation is growing up. Sunday, May 20th, we will be moving to a new commenting system.

The Spectrum community has produced over 180,000 comments in the past four years. When we moved to our current platform in 2008 we could not have expected how many important conversations would take place in this digital space.

We've had our growing pains, trying to encourage the kind of dialogue that is productive rather than destructive. And as the conversations grew larger–it's not uncommon for an article to have over 100 comments–we've come to realize that we've outgrown our current system.

Robert Jacobson was kind enough to help fill this gap with his UltraViolet browser plugin, which added a few badly needed features to our comments. This allowed us a bit more time to assess how best to move forward. We are now ready for the next step.

We will be moving to the DISQUS commenting platform beginning Sunday, May 20th. The transition will start by no longer allowing people to comment on our current system. You will still see all comments, but you will not be able to post new ones. During this time, we will import all old comments into DISQUS, which will take about 24 hours. If all goes well, we will finally take down the old comment system and turn on DISQUS. All your old comments will be there.

How will DISQUS work?

Many of you will already have encountered DISQUS comments. Very large sites such as Engadget use DISQUS, as well as other smaller sites in the Adventist blogosphere. Its basic functions will be very similar to those of our current system, but there will be several notable changes.

1. All users will be required to provide a verifiable identity.

For the past few years we've allowed people to comment without a verified email address. This will change with DISQUS. We will require that all people use a verifiable email, or other identification, such as a Facebook or Twitter account, to comment. You will still be allowed to maintain your privacy by using a pseudonym, but this verifiable ID will allow us to better moderate the conversation. Anybody with accounts on our current system will have to create a new one on DISQUS. You can create an account now here.

2. We will introduce nested conversations.

For the past four years our comments have been 'flat' in that they only order themselves chronologically. With DISQUS, we will allow you to directly respond to other comments, allowing nicely nested conversations. Hopefully this can both encourage a diversity of conversation as well as making it easier to follow the conversations you are taking part in.

3. We will be introducing a new comment policy.

In an effort to make our community a more respectful and enriching experience, the Spectrum Web Team has created a Spectrum Commenters Covenant that outlines each of our responsibilities as participants in this online forum. All future editorial decisions on comments will be based on this policy.

4. The community will help shape the conversation.

In light of the Spectrum Community Covenant, we hope that all of you will help us in raising the level of discourse on the site. DISQUS will provide some tools that will help in this. You will be able to vote up a comment as well as flag comments. By up-voting comments we hope that we will be able to raise the best comments to the top. DISQUS will even allow you to order comments based on the number of positive votes it has received. Spam and comments that break the community covanent can be flagged by users. This will bring these comments to our attention so we can deal with them appropriately.

Thank you for making Spectrum the community of conversation.

LSU Responds to Biology Professor Lee Greer

La Sierra University generated a lot of news last week, with a press release by biology professor Dr. Lee Greer that prompted a story in the local paper. Asked for a response, this is what the university had to say:

Dr. Lee Greer is currently employed by La Sierra University as a non-tenured Assistant Professor of Biology. His contract expires by its own terms on June 30, 2012. The University honors its contractual commitments.

Beyond confirming the status of employment, the University does not comment on specific details of personnel matters as a matter of policy. This puts the University at a disadvantage in responding to public criticism such as Dr. Greer's "press release," but it is the policy of most employers for sound reasons of human resource management and the law.

Atlantic Union Conference Releases Statement on Women in Ministry

At its regularly scheduled quarterly meeting on May 10, 2012, the Atlantic Union Conference Executive Committee voted the following statement regarding women in ministry.

ATLANTIC UNION CONFERENCE STATEMENT ON WOMEN IN MINISTRY

Recognizing the current discussions and the value of women in ministry within the North American Division, the Atlantic Union Conference Executive Committee voted the following statement:
 
WHEREAS the Atlantic Union Conference and its member conferences and organizations have benefitted from the faithful service and commitment of women in ministry, including evangelistic, pastoral, educational and other roles at all levels of the church and school system, and
 
WHEREAS the Atlantic Union Conference recognizes itself as a part of the Seventh-day Adventist church, and will act in harmony with its decisions taken during the General Conference in business session, it is therefore
 
RESOLVED, that the Atlantic Union Conference, in harmony with the scriptural mandates of the priesthood of all believers, is committed to supporting, empowering and celebrating women in ministry.
 
###

 

Kinship International Responds to British Union Conference Statement on Same-Sex Marriage

We carefully read the British Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventists’ recent statement about the government’s 12-week consultation on same-sex marriage in England and Wales.

We are interested in the well-being of BUC members and the society in which they live: several of our members and relatives have lived or still live in the British Union Conference (BUC). As current or former Seventh-day Adventists, we are also keenly interested in how the church treats lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) Adventists, and how church officials interact withthe rest of civic society in our name. It is because of our connections to the BUC that the Union’s statement deeply concerns us.

The statement consistently subordinates universal “respect”, “genuine love for all”, and “moves for equality and eradication of discrimination” to administrators’ judgments about LGBTIQ people, their spiritual needs, and their relationships. The Union’s plan to spread these judgments“with some vigour” and “encourage” church members to sign a hostile petition also betrays a failure to consult with the population affected by the legal status quo and the BUC’s lobbying. Regardless of whether British law ever fully recognises their marriages, LGBTIQ people are members of the BUC, and with other British citizens will be affected by the public discussion and the union’s role in it.

Of course we empathisewith the BUC’s wish to honour current church policy. And so we must point out that the government’s civic proposal will have no impact on the policies or teachings of the Seventh-day Adventist church. Just as our church doesn’t take doctrinal cues from any national government, we don’t believe that the British government should take legal cues from our church or its union representatives. On behalf of English and Welsh LGBTIQ people and supportive heterosexuals, we’re grateful that the British government is willing to discuss full respect for the committed, monogamous relationships of all citizens regardless of their sexual orientation.

We would strongly object to external political interference in a denominational dialogue, and must now object to the BUC’s plan to insert itself into a national civic discussion. We don’t foresee and wouldn’t support the emergence of a Britain that forced reluctant churches to wed same-sex couples: nothing comparable to mandatory marrying has occurred with other legal changes in the last two centuries. Progressive amendments to British law since 1857 have allowed private citizens to divorce and remarry—yet denominations whose doctrines prohibit second marriages are not required to marry divorcees and are not sanctioned for their beliefs. After more than 150 years of legal private divorce, the only citizens who divorce and remarry under the law are those whose moral convictions permit them to. Other citizens are not obligated to divorce, and no churches are mandated either way.

We believe that the Union’s plan to promote public discrimination in the name of British Seventh-day Adventists would breach the civic and religious liberties of LGBTIQ and supportive heterosexual Adventists, as well as the liberties of other citizens outside the Adventist church. Like many in England and Wales, our religious and individual convictions inspire us to support adults who choose to participate in the commitment, self-sacrifice, and social responsibilities of married family life. Therefore, when BUC administrators announced their intent to influence the national discussion in our name, we were compelled to speak for ourselves: the Union did not speak for us or the British LGBTIQ people we serve.

As part of an autonomous religious group, the BUC remains free to withhold sacramental rites from certain members in its territory, including ordination rites from called female ministers and marital rites from some heterosexual divorcees and all LGBTIQ people.

Nevertheless, there are LGBTIQ and supportive heterosexual Seventh-day Adventists in the British Union’s territory, and we are open to dialogue with Union representatives on this issue. We are available to discuss our lived experience with the matters raised in the Union’s statement: how our families, children, and community lives are affected by the current law and proposal, and what opportunities our church now has to serve our population more effectively.

It’s important to us to support the people in our community as well as the well-being and integrity of the church at large. We feel strongly that the British Union cannot do its best work with us—and may in fact do great harm—if it fails to engage its LGBTIQ members in respectful conversation over time.

We remain the BUC’s children, siblings, and friends.

In Kinship and love,

Yolanda Elliott (For the Board of Seventh-day Adventist Kinship, Int’l)

Terence Rice, M.Div. (Director of Church Relations)

Mike Lewis (Former regional coordinator, United Kingdom)

Marcos Apolonio, B.Th (Chaplain)

Newsletter

Organizations

Fri, 08/31/2012 - Sun, 09/02/2012
Job Dybdahl, Sigve Tonstad, Harri Kuhalampi
Sat, 09/08/2012 | San Diego Adventist Forum
Sigve Tonstad, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Religion, Loma Linda University

Current Issue

Not yet a subscriber? Subscribe today!

Ads

Support Spectrum

Connect with Spectrum